Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20223289262

Hillside Motors, 292-300 Carshalton Road, Carshalton, SM5 3QB

Planning appeal 3289262 at Hillside Motors, 292-300 Carshalton Road, Carshalton, SM5 3QB (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 9 December 2022 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the loss of a commercial use within the local centre.

the demolition of 292-300 Carshalton Road and redevelopment by a 3-storey building to provide nine self-contained residential flats (Class C3), cycle and car parking, landscaping and incidental works

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S
Postcode
SM5 3QB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the loss of a commercial use within the local centre
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • access arrangements
  • tree protection
  • drainage

What decided it

The proposed access arrangements would introduce a significant increase in the potential for conflict between road users that could result in crashes or injuries, making the development unacceptable on highway safety grounds contrary to the development plan and Framework.

The modest benefits of housing supply and economic benefits during construction were outweighed by the substantial and long-lasting harm arising from unacceptable highway safety impacts.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 18Policy 28Policy 32Policy 36Policy 37SI 5SI 12SI 13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 110Paragraph 111

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

310 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Sutton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266002198
    103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
  2. Allowed25 June 20263371477
    79-85 Beddington Lane, Beddington , Sutton, CR0 4TH
  3. Dismissed18 September 20253365663
    Land to Rear of 81 Kingsmead Avenue, Worcester Park, London, KT4 8UZ
  4. Dismissed14 August 20253364800
    60 Waverley Avenue, Sutton, SM1 3JY
  5. Allowed28 April 20253353135
    231 Woodcote Road, Purley, CR8 3PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.