Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 February 20233289300

Church Lane, Castle Hedingham, Essex

2 bedroom cottage

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dyer I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, with particular reference to the Castle Hedingham Conservation Area
  • Whether the development would provide adequate living conditions for future residents, with particular reference to amenity space and parking provision
  • Whether the development would provide safe access for all users of the proposal and the public highway

What decided it

The material harm to the Castle Hedingham Conservation Area caused by the incongruous design features, particularly the balcony and roof lights, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal, and the development would fail to provide adequate living conditions and safe access.

The less-than-substantial harm to the Conservation Area was weighed against the limited public benefits of providing an additional dwelling and bringing a derelict site back into use, but the harm was not outweighed, particularly given the considerable importance and weight of the statutory duty to preserve or enhance the Conservation Area.

Framework references: 202, 200, 11, 110

Plan policies cited: LPP47, LPP53, LPP35, LPP43, LPP52

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.