Planning appeal decision
Church Lane, Castle Hedingham, Essex
Planning appeal 3289300 at Church Lane, Castle Hedingham, Essex (Braintree District Council) was dismissed on 9 February 2023 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, with particular reference to the Castle Hedingham Conservation Area.
2 bedroom cottage
- Authority
- Braintree District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Dyer I
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area, with particular reference to the Castle Hedingham Conservation Area
- Whether the development would provide adequate living conditions for future residents, with particular reference to amenity space and parking provision
- Whether the development would provide safe access for all users of the proposal and the public highway
What decided it
The material harm to the Castle Hedingham Conservation Area caused by the incongruous design features, particularly the balcony and roof lights, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal, and the development would fail to provide adequate living conditions and safe access.
The less-than-substantial harm to the Conservation Area was weighed against the limited public benefits of providing an additional dwelling and bringing a derelict site back into use, but the harm was not outweighed, particularly given the considerable importance and weight of the statutory duty to preserve or enhance the Conservation Area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LPP47LPP53LPP35LPP43LPP52
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 200Paragraph 11Paragraph 110
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Braintree District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed12 October 202660127499 Kemsley Road, Earls Colne, CO6 2NU
- Dismissed21 January 20263366289Broadfields Nursery, Broad Road, Braintree, CM7 5NJ
- Allowed6 November 20253369428Windyridge, Chapel End Way, Stambourne, Halstead, CO9 4NX
- Dismissed14 October 20253366906Land Rear of 5 Butler Road, Leather Lane, Great Yeldham, Essex, CO9 4JB
- Dismissed28 May 20253352260Land North West Of Maltbeggars Farm, Tey Road, Coggeshall, Essex, CO6 1SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®