Planning appeal decision
15 High Street, Sydling St. Nicholas, Dorchester, Sydling St Nicholas, DT2 9PB
Planning appeal 3289639 at 15 High Street, Sydling St. Nicholas, Dorchester, Sydling St Nicholas, DT2 9PB (Dorset) was dismissed on 5 January 2023 by Inspector Fish A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to the spatial strategy for housing in the development plan.
Erection of 2 traditionally styled dwellings and garage/workshop/office
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Fish A
- Postcode
- DT2 9PB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to the spatial strategy for housing in the development plan
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sydling St Nicholas Conservation Area and the setting of 13 High Street, a Grade II listed building
- Whether the proposed development would conserve or enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the Dorset Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to policies relating to development in areas at risk of flooding
What decided it
The cumulative harm to designated heritage assets (Conservation Area and listed building setting) and the AONB, combined with spatial strategy conflicts and unresolved flood risk concerns, outweighed the modest public benefits of two dwellings.
The moderate harm to the Conservation Area and Grade II listed building setting, assessed as less than substantial but failing the statutory preservation tests, and harm to the AONB scenic beauty, were not outweighed by the modest cumulative public benefits of housing supply, economic benefits and biodiversity gains, particularly given the Council's demonstrated five-year housing land supply of 5.85 years.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SUS2Policy ENV4Policy ENV1Policy ENV5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 134Paragraph 176Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 167
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266010776The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
- Dismissed23 October 2026601467352 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
- Dismissed22 October 20266012104Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
- Dismissed22 October 20266011513Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
- Allowed21 October 20266010895Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®