Planning appeal decision
Land at Slack Fields Lane and Storth Lane, Wharncliffe Side, Sheffield, S35 0DW
Planning appeal 3289754 at Land at Slack Fields Lane and Storth Lane, Wharncliffe Side, Sheffield, S35 0DW (Sheffield City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 9 March 2023 by Inspector Whitfield J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue is the effect of the development without compliance with condition 2 of the 1995 permission on highway and pedestrian safety.
Appeal A: use of the development permitted under the 1995 permission without complying with condition 2 (means of access); Appeal B: engineering operation to raise land levels, change of use of land from agriculture to residential garden use, and construction of a retaining wall
- Authority
- Sheffield City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Whitfield J
- Postcode
- S35 0DW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue is the effect of the development without compliance with condition 2 of the 1995 permission on highway and pedestrian safety.
- Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to relevant development plan policies and the Framework, including the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
- If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development.
What decided it
The unauthorised means of access caused harm to highway and pedestrian safety (Appeal A), and the Green Belt harm from inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist (Appeal B).
Substantial weight given to Green Belt harm from inappropriateness and to openness was not clearly outweighed by the little or very little weight given to the temporary harm of restoration works, the alleged GPDO fallback wall, and a permitted development restriction condition, so very special circumstances were not established.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved Policy H14Saved Policy BE9Saved Policy GE1Saved Policy GE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56Paragraph 111Paragraph 112Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sheffield City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263378304Step Rehabilitation, 30 Troutbeck Road, Sheffield, S7 2QA
- Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263376754Land at the Junction of Spital Street, Sorby Street, And Carlisle Street,, Sheffield, S4 7LJ
- Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263374622Land At Rear Of 551-561 Attercliffe Road, Kimberley Street, Sheffield, S9 3RA
- Split Decision23 July 20263377264Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX
- Allowed21 July 20266004273Site Of Former 27 Skew Hill, Sheffield, S35 8QW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®