Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 July 20223290034

Sattva Park Lane, Marchwood, Southampton, SO40 4WL

Planning appeal 3290034 at Sattva Park Lane, Marchwood, Southampton, SO40 4WL (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 25 July 2022 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

new-built single storey detached bungalow and garage on land adjacent Sattva”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Leonard S
Postcode
SO40 4WL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the ecological integrity of the New Forest and Solent Coast European designated nature conservation sites (EPS)

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, arising from the visually intrusive and incongruous nature of the proposed development in a prominent edge-of-settlement location, outweighs the modest housing supply and economic benefits even under the tilted balance of paragraph 11 of the Framework.

The modest housing supply contribution, economic benefits, and social benefits of providing a single-storey dwelling suited to first-time buyers and elderly downsizers were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 8Paragraph 69

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in New Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed2 July 20266001075
    Ss6 Land East of Lower Pennington Lane, Pennington, Lymington, SO41 8AL
  2. Dismissed29 May 20266003790
    1 Duncan Road, New Milton, BH25 5AW
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266002232
    Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR
  4. Dismissed21 May 20263369784
    Little Nutley, Ringwood Road, Sopley, BH23 7BB
  5. Allowed29 April 20266005105
    Land at New Lane, Milford-on-Sea, SO41 0UQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.