Planning appeal decision
94 Shepherds Hill, Romford, RM3 0NJ
1. Without planning permission, the material change of use of the land to a dog walking business; and 2. Without planning permission, the installation of CCTV cameras
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Boffin D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the alleged breaches of planning control constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt, the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of nearby occupiers with regard to noise and disturbance
- If the alleged breaches of planning control constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, whether this amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The material change of use preserved the openness of the Green Belt and fell within the paragraph 150(e) exception, and any noise/disturbance harm to neighbours could be adequately mitigated by planning conditions.
Framework references: 137, 149, 150, 56, 130, 185
Plan policies cited: Policy G2, Policy D14, Policy 7
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®