Planning appeal decision
Former Jolly Boatman and Land Adjoining Hampton Court Station, Hampton Court Way, East Molesey, KT8 9AE
Planning appeal 3291461 at Former Jolly Boatman and Land Adjoining Hampton Court Station, Hampton Court Way, East Molesey, KT8 9AE (Elmbridge Borough Council) was allowed on 8 July 2022 by Inspector Prentis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition and redevelopment to provide 97 homes, a hotel (84 beds) and retail units for uses within Use Class E, together with access, station interchange, car parking, servicing, new public realm, landscaping and other associated works
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Prentis D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the historic environment
- whether the proposal would make sufficient provision for affordable housing
- the effect of the proposal on highway networks and the extent to which it would support the objective of promoting sustainable transport
- the effect of the proposal on public open space
- the effect of the proposal on the East Molesey (Kent Town) Conservation Area
What decided it
Appeal A was decided on its overall accordance with the development plan, supported by significant housing, heritage and highway benefits, while Appeal B was decided on the public benefits of avoiding phased construction and reduced on-street parking outweighing the temporary, reversible harm to open space and the conservation area.
Appeal A: no significant development plan conflicts were found and significant benefits (housing, affordable housing, heritage enhancement and highway improvements) supported approval; Appeal B: temporary and reversible harm to open space and the conservation area, though of considerable importance, was outweighed by public benefits of a shorter overall construction period and reduced on-street parking demand.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS7Policy CS12Policy CS14Policy CS17Policy CS21Policy CS25Policy DM2Policy DM7Policy DM12Policy DM13Policy DM20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed6 October 20266010653Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
- Allowed3 September 20266007869Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
- Allowed10 August 2026600603331 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
- Allowed9 July 202660055521a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
- Allowed29 May 202660058508-14 Oatlands Drive, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 9JL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®