Planning appeal decision
Hoath Farm, Bekesbourne Lane , Canterbury , CT3 4AB
Planning appeal 3291653 at Hoath Farm, Bekesbourne Lane , Canterbury , CT3 4AB (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 7 September 2022 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the development would be in a suitable location having regard to its position within the countryside, its accessibility, and the overall spatial strategy for the area.
demolition of existing commercial building along with removal of commercial yard and erection with two dwellings, together with associa ted parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bowyer J
- Postcode
- CT3 4AB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the development would be in a suitable location having regard to its position within the countryside, its accessibility, and the overall spatial strategy for the area
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Stodmarsh Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar Site
What decided it
The likely significant effect on the integrity of the Stodmarsh Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar Site through additional nutrient loading, which could not be adequately mitigated and which provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11 of the Framework.
The benefits of housing delivery and modest social and economic benefits were outweighed by the adverse effect on designated nature conservation sites and conflict with the Habitats Regulations, which was a matter of overriding concern.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HD4Policy DBE3Policy LB5Policy LB6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 September 20266008107Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Dismissed28 September 20266008105Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Allowed24 September 2026601061482 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
- Allowed18 September 20266009081Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
- Dismissed11 August 2026600962869 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®