Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 March 20233292143

65 Mayswood Gardens, DAGENHAM, RM10 8UU

the demolition of existing double garage and the construction of a 1x bedroom Bungalow with mansard roof with associated refuse and bicycle storage

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Forrett C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 63, 65 and 65A Mayswood Gardens
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for the future occupiers of the property

What decided it

The lack of natural lighting to habitable rooms would create an oppressive and unacceptable internal living environment for future occupiers, which significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.

The benefits of housing delivery and associated social and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the poor living conditions which future occupiers would suffer from, rendering the proposal unsustainable development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CP2 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policy CP3 of the Core Strategy, Policy BP8 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document (2011), Policy BP11 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document (2011), Policy D1 of The London Plan (2021), Policy D4 of The London Plan (2021), Policy D8 of The London Plan (2021)

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd. v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another 1982

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.