Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 September 20233292224

The Studio, Lee Priory, Littlebourne, CT3 1UR

Planning appeal 3292224 at The Studio, Lee Priory, Littlebourne, CT3 1UR (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 1 September 2023 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to local and national planning policy, and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities.

conversion of existing ancillary residential outbuildings, with two single storey link extensions, to form a single dwellinghouse

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B
Postcode
CT3 1UR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to local and national planning policy, and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, Lee House, and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Lee Priory and Garrington Conservation Area

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building and the character and appearance of the conservation area, combined with the site's unsuitability due to poor accessibility to services and location in open countryside, outweighs the modest public benefits of housing supply and efficient land use.

The modest public benefits of housing supply, efficient use of the site, temporary construction employment, and future resident expenditure were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the heritage assets and the site's unsuitability in terms of location and accessibility, with great weight given to conservation of the designated heritage assets.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy HD4Policy SP1Policy DBE3Policy HE1Policy HE4Policy HE6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 80Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266008107
    Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266008105
    Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  3. Allowed24 September 20266010614
    82 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
  4. Allowed18 September 20266009081
    Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
  5. Dismissed11 August 20266009628
    69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.