Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld14 April 20233292658

Land at 47 Veda Road, LONDON, SE13 7JQ

unauthorised front roof slope extension

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Walker A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A ground (e): whether copies of the enforcement notice were served as required by section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  • Appeal A ground (b): whether the matters alleged in the notice have occurred
  • Appeal A ground (c): whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control
  • Appeal B: whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a lawful development certificate was well-founded

What decided it

Appeal A: the appellant's concession that the roof slope extension occurred and does not benefit from permitted development, establishing a breach of planning control. Appeal B: the building including the in-set area exceeds the 50% curtilage limitation in paragraph E.1(b) of the GPDO.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.