Planning appeal decision
Bimport House, 15 Bimport, Shaftesbury, Dorset, SP7 8AT
Planning appeal 3293048 at Bimport House, 15 Bimport, Shaftesbury, Dorset, SP7 8AT (Dorset) was dismissed on 23 August 2022 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the Shaftesbury Conservation Area, the setting of the adjacent listed building (Nos. 5 and 7 Bimport), and the non-designated heritage asset (Bimport House).
conversion and extension of existing outbuilding to form new dwelling; vehicle access and associated development
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Tucker A
- Postcode
- SP7 8AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the Shaftesbury Conservation Area, the setting of the adjacent listed building (Nos. 5 and 7 Bimport), and the non-designated heritage asset (Bimport House)
- Whether the proposal would secure acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling, with regard to layout
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building, combined with the failure to provide acceptable living conditions, outweighs the public benefit of housing delivery, and the heritage exception to the tilted balance applies.
The public benefits of housing delivery, improved access visibility, and potential building repair were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, listed building setting, and non-designated heritage asset, with great weight given to heritage conservation under paragraph 199 of the Framework
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 5Policy 7Policy 24Policy SFDH1Policy SFDH6Policy SFDH7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 189Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed29 October 20266010776The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
- Dismissed23 October 2026601467352 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
- Dismissed22 October 20266012104Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
- Dismissed22 October 20266011513Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
- Allowed21 October 20266010895Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®