Planning appeal decision
Land North of Finkle Street, Sowerby Bridge, HX6 1NG
Planning appeal 3293216 at Land North of Finkle Street, Sowerby Bridge, HX6 1NG (Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 29 June 2022 by Inspector Wilkinson F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework, including the effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
two detached dwellings with retained existing site entrance and water harvesting tank
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wilkinson F
- Postcode
- HX6 1NG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework, including the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the safe use of the highway
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and highway safety concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the limited housing benefit in an area without a five-year supply.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, together with significant harm to character and appearance and harm to highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the limited contribution to housing supply where a five-year supply cannot be demonstrated, and therefore the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GNE1Policy BE1Policy BE5Policy BE6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Calderdale
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed22 October 20266012724Mona Cottage, 1 Dewsbury Road, Elland, HX5 9JU
- Allowed12 October 2026600957629 Syke Lane, Lightcliffe, Brighouse, HX3 8SY
- Dismissed9 October 20266008120Ashdene, Syke Lane, Ogden, Halifax, HX2 9NU
- Dismissed3 September 20266008062Land North of Helm Farm Cottages, Helm Lane, Triangle, Sowerby Bridge, HX6 3DU
- Allowed1 September 20266010078Windmill Court County House, Keighley Road, Illingworth,, Halifax, HX2 8YB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®