Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 January 20233293836

Land to South East of Jury Farm and East of , Ripley Lane, West Horsley Nr Leatherhead, Surrey, KT24 6JT

Planning appeal 3293836 at Land to South East of Jury Farm and East of , Ripley Lane, West Horsley Nr Leatherhead, Surrey, KT24 6JT (Guildford Borough Council) was allowed on 4 January 2023 by Inspector Grierson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

Change of use of land from agriculture to a use for the walking, day care and training of dogs

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Grierson E
Postcode
KT24 6JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the impact of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the impact of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings with regards to noise

What decided it

The change of use preserves the openness of the Green Belt and does not conflict with the purposes of Green Belt designation, falling within the exception in paragraph 150(e) of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy D1(4)Policy WH3(i)Policy WH3(iii)Policy G1(3)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 138Paragraph 149Paragraph 150

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

35 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Notice upheld30 September 20263366379
    86 Haydon Place, Guildford, GU1 4LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.