Planning appeal decision
Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
Planning appeal 6009810 at Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area.
for the conversion of existing barns to two pairs of semi-detached dwellings
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- GU3 1DL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the Surrey Hills National Landscape
- whether the site is a suitable location for dwellings, having regard to its access to local services and facilities
- whether biodiversity net gain could be achieved, having regard to whether the self-build custom build exemption would apply
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- if the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, together with the harm to the Surrey Hills National Landscape and the Thames Basin Heaths SPA, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.
the substantial weight attributed to Green Belt, SHNL and SPA harm, together with considerable weight given to the other identified harms, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, which carried substantial weight, so the benefits of the proposal were substantially outweighed by the harms
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P5saved Policy NRM6Policy P1Policy D1Policy D4Policy ID3Policy P7Policy ID4Policy P2Policy S1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy N6Policy N4Policy TR3Policy GB6Policy GB7Policy GB2Policy S3Policy S5
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
- Allowed14 October 20266009751Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
- Allowed5 October 20266012736The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
- Dismissed23 September 20266009962Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA
- Dismissed22 September 20266010525Meadow Cottage, Brook Hill, Brook, GU5 9DJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®