Planning appeal decision
Flat 1, Bucklands Court, 4 Sydenham Hill, London, SE26 6SJ
Planning appeal 3294164 at Flat 1, Bucklands Court, 4 Sydenham Hill, London, SE26 6SJ (London Borough of Lewisham) was dismissed on 18 September 2023 by Inspector Moore D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded.
a B1(a) Business Base (Office)
- Authority
- London Borough of Lewisham
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Moore D
- Postcode
- SE26 6SJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded
What decided it
The appellant failed to provide sufficient, precise and unambiguous evidence to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the building had been continuously used as an office for more than 10 years prior to the enforcement notice.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Quashed On Legal Grounds29 July 20263350448Bestfood Supermarket, 30 Loampit Hill, London, SE13 7SW
- Notice varied and upheld19 March 20263290410Land and Buildings to the Rear of 243-265 Bromley Road, London, SE6 2RA
- Quashed On Legal Grounds11 March 20263352755222 Verdant Lane, London, SE6 1TN
- Notice varied and upheld26 February 2026334275711 Dunkery Road, London, SE9 4HX
- Notice varied and upheld16 February 2026335545451 Sydenham Road, London, SE26 5EX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®