Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 August 20223294577

33 Renters Avenue, LONDON, NW4 3RD

the conversion of the existing dwellings into 4no self- contained flats including part single, part two storey rear extensions with Juliet balconies at first floor level and roof extensions including rear dormer window with Juliet balconies. Associated cycle store/parking and refuse/recycling

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 35 Renters Avenue with particular regard to access to daylight, sunlight and outlook
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with respect to outlook, privacy and the size of accommodation
  • The effect of the proposed parking provision on highway and pedestrian safety

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area, provide substandard living conditions for future occupiers, and fail to demonstrate adequate parking provision, collectively conflicting with the development plan.

Framework references: 48, 11

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy T6.1, Core Strategy Policy CS1, Core Strategy Policy CS5, Core Strategy Policy CS9, Core Strategy Policy CS15, Development Management Policies DPD Policy DM01, Development Management Policies DPD Policy DM02, Development Management Policies DPD Policy DM17, Barnet Draft Local Plan Policy TR03

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.