Planning appeal decision
Land to the North of Combs Lane, Combs Lane, Great Finborough, Suffolk, IP14 3BN
Planning appeal 3294676 at Land to the North of Combs Lane, Combs Lane, Great Finborough, Suffolk, IP14 3BN (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 24 March 2023 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to local and national planning policy for the delivery of housing and accessibility to services and facilities.
construction of 2 no. detached dwellings and new vehicle access to the highway to be constructed in 3 phases
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hickey A
- Postcode
- IP14 3BN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to local and national planning policy for the delivery of housing and accessibility to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect on living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook
- whether the proposal would comply with local and national planning policy, which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding
What decided it
The proposal failed to undertake a sequential test to establish whether reasonably available sites with lower flood probability existed, combined with the unsustainable location requiring private vehicle reliance and significant harm to character and appearance, which together provided clear reasons for refusal that outweighed the modest housing benefit.
The modest benefit of two additional dwellings and some economic benefits from construction and future occupiers supporting local services was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the unsustainable location, unacceptable impact on character and appearance, and failure to demonstrate the site was the most suitable with regard to flooding risks.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS2Policy GP1Policy CS5Policy H16Policy CS4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80Paragraph 135Paragraph 162Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®