Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 July 20223295033

61 Long Lane, Ickenham, UXBRIDGE, UB10 8QU

demolition of existing two storey detached dwelling and the erection of a two-storey apartment building to provide 4 x 2 bed, 4 x 1 bed and 1 x 2 bed penthouse together with associated parking, refuse and recycling provision/storage and landscaping

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jordan A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Ickenham Village Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposal would lead to an unacceptable loss of a five-bedroomed dwelling
  • The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of future and adjoining residential occupiers
  • The effects of the proposal on protected species

What decided it

The proposal failed to comply with adopted development plan policy on multiple independent grounds: conservation area harm, housing mix requirements, living conditions for future occupiers, and protected species protection.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy HE1, Policy DMHB 1, Policy DMHB 4, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHB 12, Policy DMH 2, Policy DMHB 15, Policy DMHB 16, Policy DMEI 7, Policy DMHB17, Policy HC1, Policy D1, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy H10, Policy D6, Policy G6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.