61 Long Lane, Ickenham, Uxbridge, UB10 8QU

Planning appeal 3295033 at 61 Long Lane, Ickenham, Uxbridge, UB10 8QU (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 15 July 2022 by Inspector Jordan A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Ickenham Village Conservation Area.

demolition of existing two storey detached dwelling and the erection of a two-storey apartment building to provide 4 x 2 bed, 4 x 1 bed and 1 x 2 bed penthouse together with associated parking, refuse and recycling provision/storage and landscaping

Authority: London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Jordan A
Postcode: UB10 8QU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Ickenham Village Conservation Area
Whether the proposal would lead to an unacceptable loss of a five-bedroomed dwelling
The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of future and adjoining residential occupiers
The effects of the proposal on protected species

What decided it

The proposal failed to comply with adopted development plan policy on multiple independent grounds: conservation area harm, housing mix requirements, living conditions for future occupiers, and protected species protection.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy BE1Policy HE1Policy DMHB 1Policy DMHB 4Policy DMHB 11Policy DMHB 12Policy DMH 2Policy DMHB 15Policy DMHB 16Policy DMEI 7Policy DMHB17Policy HC1Policy D1Policy D3Policy D4Policy H10Policy D6Policy G6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

354 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed27 October 20266015310
4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
Dismissed27 October 20266009856
18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
Dismissed21 October 20266011782
25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
Dismissed19 October 20266011268
364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
Allowed6 October 20266013858
88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.