Planning appeal decision
Atcost Barn, Glen Farm, Sandy Lane, Lower Failand, BS8 3SE
Planning appeal 3295116 at Atcost Barn, Glen Farm, Sandy Lane, Lower Failand, BS8 3SE (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 2 November 2022 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
described on the application form as, “Replacement of existing building to create new dwelling including building operations (alterations to Prior Approval ref: 19/P/1343/CQA for the change of use of an agricultural building (Sui Generis Use) to 1no. dwelling house (Use class C3))
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
- Postcode
- BS8 3SE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site is in a suitable location for new housing, having regard to the proximity to local services
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduced openness, together with the unsustainable location, are not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight given to the housing land supply shortfall, fallback position, and other benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt (inappropriateness and loss of openness) and limited weight given to the unsustainable location were not clearly outweighed by moderate weight for the fallback position and housing land supply shortfall, moderate weight for one self-build dwelling on a small site, and limited weight for environmental and economic benefits, resulting in the balance tipping against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM12Policy DM32Policy DM44Policy DM45Policy CS1Policy CS6Policy CS14Policy CS33
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 47Paragraph 48Paragraph 49Paragraph 50Paragraph 64Paragraph 69Paragraph 81Paragraph 105Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
- Judgments
- Gambone v SSCLG [2014] EWHC 952 (Admin); Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Somerset Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed9 October 20266011867Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
- Dismissed6 August 20266007743Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
- Dismissed8 June 20266006387Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
- Dismissed11 November 20253366314Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
- Dismissed26 September 20253365815Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®