Planning appeal decision
Land at Redhills, Exeter, EX4 1SU
Planning appeal 3296067 at Land at Redhills, Exeter, EX4 1SU (Exeter City Council) was dismissed on 28 November 2022 by Inspector Jones M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Alphington/Whitestone Valley Park.
outline planning application for a residential development of up to 35 dwellings and associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Exeter City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Alphington/Whitestone Valley Park
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of Lugg's Farmhouse
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
What decided it
The harm to the setting of the listed building Lugg's Farmhouse, combined with unacceptable effects on character and appearance and highway safety, engaged the protective policy in Paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework and could not be outweighed by the housing benefits.
The significant public benefits of 35 new dwellings (50% affordable) and economic benefits were outweighed by the substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Valley Park, less than substantial harm to the listed building's setting (to which considerable weight was given), and unacceptable highway safety effects, in the context of the strong presumption in s.66 of the Listed Buildings Act.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP16Policy CP17saved Policy DG1saved Policy C2Policy AP1Policy T3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Exeter
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed27 October 2026601210370-72 Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LP
- Dismissed20 October 2026601032413C St. James Road, Exeter, EX4 6PY
- Dismissed7 October 2026601549141 Well Street, Exeter, EX4 6QQ
- Allowed24 September 20266015017550 Topsham Road, Exeter, EX2 7DP
- Dismissed23 September 20266013697Pavement O/S Clarendon House, 3 Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®