Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision21 July 20233296747

30 Burstock Road, London, SW15 2PW

Planning appeal 3296747 at 30 Burstock Road, London, SW15 2PW (London Borough of Wandsworth) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 21 July 2023 by Inspector Jones R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site, the surrounding area and the Oxford Road Conservation Area.

without planning permission and within the last four years the installation of an enclosure at roof level to facilitate formation of a roof terrace and the installation of dark framed windows on the front elevation at the Property

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones R
Postcode
SW15 2PW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site, the surrounding area and the Oxford Road Conservation Area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The dark framed windows, whilst materially affecting external appearance, were acceptable in the context of a post-war non-characteristic property within a mixed streetscape and provided visual consistency with the approved ancillary building, whereas the roof enclosure caused significant harm to conservation area character and unacceptable privacy harm through overlooking.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DMPD Policy DMS 1DMPD Policy DMS 2DMPD Policy DMH 5CS Policy IS 3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

564 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Notice upheld10 August 20263364864
    Garages Rear of 76-78 , Tooting High Street , London, SW17 0RN
  2. Notice upheld24 March 20263341914
    25 Montserrat Road, London, SW15 2LD
  3. Dismissed24 February 20263356608
    Flat First and Second Floors, 82 Northcote Road, London, SW11 6QN
  4. Notice varied and upheld20 February 20263350798
    51 Lydden Grove, London, SW18 4LJ
  5. Notice varied and upheld17 February 20263357602
    107 Carslake Road, London, SW15 3DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.