Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 December 20223296889

Fir Island, The Ridgeway, London, NW7 1AX

Planning appeal 3296889 at Fir Island, The Ridgeway, London, NW7 1AX (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 29 December 2022 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Change of use of, and alterations to, the existing building including a two storey side extension to provide a children's day nursery (Use Class E) with associated changes to hard and soft landscaping. Provision of off-street parking, refuse storage and cycle parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Change of use
Inspector
Edginton A
Postcode
NW7 1AX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Mill Hill Conservation Area, including the loss of protected trees, and the effect of the development on the non-designated heritage asset known as Fir Island
  • The effect of the development on highway operations, safety and parking stress
  • Whether the development would accord with local policies with regard to the availability of residential accommodation
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the Green Belt (inappropriateness and loss of openness), heritage assets (conservation area and non-designated heritage asset), highways operations and parking stress, and loss of residential accommodation could not be outweighed by the benefits of additional childcare provision, and no very special circumstances existed to justify the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS5Policy CS7Policy CS9Policy CS15Policy CSNPPFPolicy DM01Policy DM06Policy DM07Policy DM15Policy DM17Policy G2Policy G7Policy D3Policy HC1Policy T6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 130Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 202Paragraph 213

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

220 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barnet

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 May 20266004245
    15 Glebe Crescent, London, NW4 1BT
  2. Dismissed20 May 20263354231
    The Spinney, 22 Hendon Wood Lane, London, NW7 4HR
  3. Dismissed1 May 20266003427
    188 The Vale, London, NW11 8SR
  4. Allowed30 April 20266001441
    5 Llanvanor Road, London, NW2 2AR
  5. Dismissed29 April 20266003015
    Powerleague Barnet, Bobby Moore Way, Muswell Hill, Barnet, N10 1ST

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.