Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20223296974

12 South Drive, Ruislip, HA4 8EX

Planning appeal 3296974 at 12 South Drive, Ruislip, HA4 8EX (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 9 August 2022 by Inspector Brooker M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the local area, including the Midcroft, Ruislip Area of Special Local Character.

Single storey side extension approximately 3 metres in width, 9.2 metres in depth and 3.2 metres in height with flat roof

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Brooker M
Postcode
HA4 8EX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the local area, including the Midcroft, Ruislip Area of Special Local Character

What decided it

The proposed extension, in combination with existing extensions, would not be subservient in scale and character to the appeal property and would harm the character and appearance of the Midcroft, Ruislip Area of Special Local Character due to the prominent location of the property.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan 2021 Policy HC1Hillingdon Local Plan Part One Policy BE1Hillingdon Local Plan Part One Policy HE1Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two Policy DMHD 1Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two Policy DMHB 1Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two Policy DMHB 5Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two Policy DMHB 11Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two Policy DMHB 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

422 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.