Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 October 20223297465

3-4 Lansdowne Mews, Holland Park, London, W11 3AN

Planning appeal 3297465 at 3-4 Lansdowne Mews, Holland Park, London, W11 3AN (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 24 October 2022 by Inspector Wilkinson F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposed development on the living conditions of nearby residents with regard to privacy, outlook and light.

the demolition of two existing 2-storey mews houses and the erection of a 3-storey residential building comprising 6 flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilkinson F
Postcode
W11 3AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed development on the living conditions of nearby residents with regard to privacy, outlook and light

What decided it

The cumulative significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring residents with regard to privacy, outlook and light, which substantially outweighed the moderate weight afforded to housing delivery benefits in the planning balance.

The substantial harm to neighbouring living conditions was weighed against moderate weight for housing delivery (four net dwellings) and limited weight for social and economic benefits; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits, tipping the balance against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 827 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.