Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20233297834

Ashfield Stockwood Vale, Keynsham, BRISTOL, BS31 2AP

Ridge to be raised to allow for new room in roof, including new dormer extension. Side balcony formed to master bedroom

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Phillips B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative volume increase of approximately 50.8% constitutes a disproportionate addition that results in inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the harm to openness and the Green Belt cannot be outweighed by the modest benefits claimed.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CP8, Policy GB3, Policy GB1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.