Planning appeal decision
Great Bricett Business Park, Great Bricett, Ipswich, IP7 7DZ
Planning appeal 3297920 at Great Bricett Business Park, Great Bricett, Ipswich, IP7 7DZ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 11 October 2022 by Inspector Wilkinson S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed development would make adequate provision for affordable housing.
change of use of the land for the siting of up to 69 mobile homes (following the demolition of existing buildings)
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Wilkinson S
- Postcode
- IP7 7DZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposed development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
- whether the location of the proposed development would enable access to services by a range of transport modes
What decided it
The unsustainable location of the site, which would not provide a genuine choice of transport modes other than by private car, outweighed the benefits of the scheme even setting aside the affordable housing shortfall.
The benefits of delivering 69 new homes did not outweigh the harm arising from the site's unsustainable location and the unjustified affordable housing contribution, such that the harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H4Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy H7Policy FC1Policy FC1.1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 57Paragraph 63Paragraph 78Paragraph 79Paragraph 105Paragraph 174Paragraph 219
- Judgments
- R(Evans) v Mid Suffolk [2021] EWHC 511; Wavendon Properties Ltd v SSHCLG and Milton Keynes Council [2019] EWHC 1524 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®