Planning appeal decision
Area of Footpath, Spring Vale, Stanycliffe, Middleton, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, M24 2HS
Planning appeal 3299881 at Area of Footpath, Spring Vale, Stanycliffe, Middleton, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, M24 2HS (Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 January 2023 by Inspector Bayliss G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, with particular reference to the Middleton Town Centre Conservation Area and Lodge Mill, a non-designated heritage asset.
the installation of a new 18m monopole tower to support antennae, associated radio-equipment housing and ancillary development
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Change of use
- Inspector
- Bayliss G
- Postcode
- M24 2HS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, with particular reference to the Middleton Town Centre Conservation Area and Lodge Mill, a non-designated heritage asset
- whether any harm identified would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the location proposed, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the monopole would cause less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area and unacceptably harm the setting of Lodge Mill, and the public benefits of improved telecommunications infrastructure were insufficient to outweigh this heritage harm and the great weight that must be attached to the asset's conservation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy P1CS Policy P2CS Policy P3CS Policy DM1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed19 October 2026601499419 Town House Road, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 9BG
- Dismissed25 September 2026601363522 Hawthorn Road, Rochdale, OL11 5JQ
- Dismissed2 September 2026600497777 Long Street, Middleton, M24 6UN
- Allowed30 July 20266005921Hollingworth Heights, Peanock Lane, Littleborough, OL15 0AD
- Dismissed18 June 20266005050Harwood Street Garage, Harwood Street, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 8NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®