Planning appeal decision
Central 37 (Formerly Laleham Healthcare), Chapel Hill / Kingsclere Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 5UH
Planning appeal 3300001 at Central 37 (Formerly Laleham Healthcare), Chapel Hill / Kingsclere Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 5UH (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was allowed on 21 July 2023 by Inspector Parsons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would provide acceptable public open space, having regard to multi-functional green space, equipped children's space and allotments.
the demolition of the existing building and the redevelopment of the site to provide up to 75 no. dwellings, with all matters reserved except for access at the point of entry/exit into the site
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Parsons J
- Postcode
- RG21 5UH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would provide acceptable public open space, having regard to multi-functional green space, equipped children's space and allotments
- The character and appearance of the area
- The setting of the South View Conservation Area, the scheduled monument of the Chapel (ruins) of the Holy Ghost, the Grade II* listed Chapels (ruins) of the Holy Ghost and Trinity, the Grade II listed lodge, entrance gateway and screen walls of the Chapel Hill Cemetery, the Grade II listed Church of the Holy Ghost and attached Presbytery and a Non-Designated Heritage Asset, The Rising Sun Public House
- The viability and vitality of The Rising Sun Public House
What decided it
The Council's deficient five-year housing land supply of 4.2 years, combined with the site's location in a dense urban area with good accessibility to services and facilities by sustainable transport, justified making effective use of this brownfield land for significant housing delivery including affordable housing.
The significant benefits of housing delivery, including affordable housing, and the re-use of a brownfield site in a sustainable location outweighed the less-than-substantial impacts, with no material considerations of sufficient weight to determine the decision other than in accordance with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EM5Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy EM11Policy EM12Policy CN1Policy CN3Policy CN6Policy CN9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
- Dismissed6 August 20266007440Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG
- Allowed10 July 20266004025Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®