Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 February 20233300296

Land and garages between numbers 39-41, Toronto Road, Exeter , Devon, EX4 6LE

demolition of existing garages and construction of three, 2-storey, 3-bedroom dwellinghouses, with integral cycle parking, private amenity space and first floor balcony to rear

Authority
Exeter City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cuthbert L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Belmont Conservation Area
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, in respect of external amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed development on the lime tree
  • whether the proposal would introduce an opportunity for crime and anti-social behaviour

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Belmont Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset, caused by the poor design of the proposal, was not outweighed by the public benefits including housing delivery and economic benefits.

The less than substantial harm to the heritage asset was not outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery (3 dwellings in an accessible location, given housing land supply shortfall), economic benefits during construction (modest weight), use of previously developed land (substantial weight), and ecological mitigation (limited weight).

Framework references: 11, 12, 16, 202

Plan policies cited: Objective 9, Policy CP17, Policy C1, Policy DG1, Policy DG4, Policy DG7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.