Planning appeal decision
The Chestnuts, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, RH5 5EE
Planning appeal 3300456 at The Chestnuts, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, RH5 5EE (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 26 January 2023 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
demolition of barn and erection of 3 / 4 bed house
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Redford R
- Postcode
- RH5 5EE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect it has upon the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development that would harm the openness of the Green Belt, and the limited benefits do not amount to very special circumstances to justify approval.
The presumption in favour of sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11(d) was displaced by the application of Green Belt protection policies, which provide a clear reason for refusing the development; the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of one new dwelling and renewable energy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS13Policy ENV4Policy ENV22Policy ENV23
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 147Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®