Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 August 20233300771

Land Adjoining Pax Cottage , Stockland Green Road , Speldhurst Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN3 0TU

demolition of existing garages, erection of a single storey dwellinghouse with associated access and landscaping

Authority
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) and any relevant development plan policies
  • Whether the proposed dwelling would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies concerned with housing in rural areas
  • The effect of the proposal on ecology and protected species
  • If it is inappropriate development, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations sufficient to demonstrate very special circumstances.

The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight afforded to the fallback position and housing supply contribution, resulting in dismissal.

Framework references: 11, 54, 80, 105, 149, 152, 176, 219

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 2, Core Policy 4, Core Policy 1, Core Policy 6, Core Policy 14, Policy MGB1, Policy LBD1, Policy EN1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.