Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of 75 Glaziers Lane, Normandy, Guildford, Surrey, GU3 2EA
Planning appeal 3300834 at Land to the Rear of 75 Glaziers Lane, Normandy, Guildford, Surrey, GU3 2EA (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 July 2023 by Inspector Gilbert J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and its effect on openness and the purposes of including land within the Green Belt.
2 no. Gypsy/Traveller pitches to be occupied by Gypsies and Travellers who fulfil the definition of Gypsies and Travellers in Annex one of the Planning Policy for Travellers Sites
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Gilbert J
- Postcode
- GU3 2EA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and its effect on openness and the purposes of including land within the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers, with reference to amenity and play space
- whether the proposal would make appropriate provision of measures to address climate change, sustainable design, construction and energy use
- the effect of the proposal on the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA), with particular regard to recreational disturbance
- whether any harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The identified harms to the Green Belt, character and appearance, living conditions, climate change and sustainable design, and the Thames Basin Heaths SPA clearly outweigh the benefits of providing two pitches and the absence of alternatives, and very special circumstances have not been demonstrated.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness and Green Belt purposes, together with significant harm regarding character and appearance, living conditions, climate change and sustainable design, and the Thames Basin Heaths SPA, clearly outweigh the moderate weight afforded to the provision of two pitches and absence of alternatives and the limited weight afforded to personal circumstances and removal of existing outbuildings.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LPSS Policy P2LPSS Policy S2LPSS Policy H1LPSS Policy D2LPSS Policy P5LPDMP Policy D4LPDMP Policy D14LPDMP Policy P6RSS Policy NRM6Policy NE4 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan 2003
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Smith v SSLUHC & Others [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- decided16 October 202660107129 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
- Allowed14 October 20266009751Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
- Dismissed6 October 20266009810Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
- Allowed5 October 20266012736The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®