Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 October 20233301006

Unit 1, 1 Bridge Street, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, SP6 1AH

Planning appeal 3301006 at Unit 1, 1 Bridge Street, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, SP6 1AH (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 4 October 2023 by Inspector Parsons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the scheme on the integrity of designated nature conservation sites, the River Avon Special Area of Conservation (RASAC), the Avon Valley Special Protection Area (AVSPA), the New Forest Special Protection Area (NPSPA), the New Forest Area of Conservation (NFSAC).

Use of first and second floor as 3 flats; retain existing A1/A2 use on ground floor; remodelling of rear ground floor to create residential unit 4; extension to form staircase to first floor; bin and cycle store

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Parsons J
Postcode
SP6 1AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the scheme on the integrity of designated nature conservation sites, the River Avon Special Area of Conservation (RASAC), the Avon Valley Special Protection Area (AVSPA), the New Forest Special Protection Area (NPSPA), the New Forest Area of Conservation (NFSAC)
  • heritage assets, namely a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA), a former bank building known as 1 Bridge Street, Fordingbridge Conservation Area, and Grade II listed buildings, known as 15-21 High Street, 5-7 High Street, 3-5 High Street, 2 and 4 High Street, and 5 and 7 Salisbury Street, having regard to their settings
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of the proposed flat 3, having regard to daylight and sunlight
  • flood risk to the occupiers of the scheme's residential unit 4

What decided it

The absence of any appropriate mechanism to secure mitigation for adverse effects on the integrity of the designated nature conservation sites (RASAC, AVSPA, NFSPA and NFSAC) meant the scheme could not proceed, as this conflict with the development plan taken as a whole was determinative and not outweighed by material considerations.

The housing and social benefits of the scheme were outweighed by the harm to the significance of the non-designated heritage asset and the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, which in accordance with paragraph 202 of the Framework was not justified by the benefits; however, the nature conservation objections and policy conflicts were determinative and would prevail regardless of heritage mitigation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STR1Policy ENV3Policy ENV1Policy DM2Policy DM3Policy CCC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in New Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed2 July 20266001075
    Ss6 Land East of Lower Pennington Lane, Pennington, Lymington, SO41 8AL
  2. Dismissed29 May 20266003790
    1 Duncan Road, New Milton, BH25 5AW
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266002232
    Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR
  4. Dismissed21 May 20263369784
    Little Nutley, Ringwood Road, Sopley, BH23 7BB
  5. Allowed29 April 20266005105
    Land at New Lane, Milford-on-Sea, SO41 0UQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.