Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 February 20233301285

Hideaway, Naphill Common, Naphill, HIGH WYCOMBE, Buckinghamshire, HP14 4SU

to construct a single storey rear extension

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed extension would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify it

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed extension combined with previous additions would exceed the 50% threshold for disproportionate additions to the original dwelling, constituting inappropriate Green Belt development that could not be justified by very special circumstances.

Framework references: 149, 147, 148

Plan policies cited: Policy CP8, Policy DM43

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.