Planning appeal decision
Land at Brook Meadows, Tiptree, CO5 0TU
the erection of up to 221 dwellings and associated infrastructure and works
- Authority
- Colchester Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wildsmith D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The extent to which the proposed development would be consistent with the development plan for the area, and whether an issue of prematurity exists with the emerging TNP
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area, in landscape and visual terms
- The effect on matters of biodiversity, ecology and the natural environment
- Whether the Council can demonstrate a 5-year supply of deliverable housing land
- Whether the submitted planning obligations would satisfactorily address the impact of the proposed development
What decided it
The proposal's conflict with the Council's adopted spatial strategy for the planned distribution of housing growth in Tiptree, given a demonstrable 5-year housing land supply meant development plan policies carried full weight.
The benefits of the scheme (market and affordable housing, economic benefits, ecological and access improvements) did not outweigh the substantial harm from conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy, moderately added to by landscape and visual harm to the appeal site and PRoW users.
Framework references: 8, 11, 12, 15, 29, 38, 50, 57, 74, 101, 102, 174, 175, 179, 180, 182
Plan policies cited: CLP1 Policy SP1, CLP1 Policy SP3, CLP1 Policy SP7, CLP1 Policy SP8, CLP2 Policy SG1, CLP2 Policy SG2, CLP2 Policy SS14, CLP2 Policy ENV1, CLP2 Policy OV2, TNP Policy TIP01, TNP Policy TIP11, TNP Policy TIP13, TNP Policy TIP15, TNP Policy TIP16
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®