Planning appeal decision
Land to South West of Laycock Village Hall, Laycock Lane, Laycock, Keighley, BD22 0PH
Planning appeal 3302294 at Land to South West of Laycock Village Hall, Laycock Lane, Laycock, Keighley, BD22 0PH (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 3 November 2022 by Inspector Megginson C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
outline planning application for residential development of 1 no. dwelling with all matters reserved except access
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Megginson C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Goose Eye and Laycock Conservation Area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, combined with less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefit of housing delivery and limited environmental benefits, such that very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
The moderate positive weight given to housing delivery and limited positive weight to environmental benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial weight required to be given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, and the less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SC7Policy GB3Policy EN3Policy EN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 138Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council (2015)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed22 October 20266013460Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
- Dismissed20 October 20266012872Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
- Dismissed15 September 20266008465Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
- Allowed10 August 20266002654Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
- Dismissed20 July 20266008285Ghyll Clough Farm, Slaymaker Lane, Oakworth, Bradford, BD22 7EH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®