Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
Planning appeal 6002654 at Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was allowed on 10 August 2026 by Inspector Zoe Raygen, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
one dwelling with access road
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Zoe Raygen
- Postcode
- LS29 9QQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would meet the policy exception for new dwellings in the countryside as set out in paragraph 84e of the National Planning Policy Framework
- The effect of the proposal on the South Pennine Moors Special Protection Area/Special Area of Conservation
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including whether the appeal site is grey belt land
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and whether the proposal would conflict with the purposes of the Green Belt
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The exceptional quality of the design meeting paragraph 84e of the Framework, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate five-year housing land supply and substantial biodiversity net gain benefits, clearly outweighed the Green Belt harm and established very special circumstances.
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and modest harm to Green Belt purposes were clearly outweighed by the significant weight of housing delivery at a time when the Council cannot demonstrate five-year supply, the substantial benefit of 71% biodiversity net gain, and the significant benefit of exceptional design quality complying with paragraph 84e, establishing very special circumstances to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN4 of the Local Plan for Bradford Core Strategy Development Plan Document 2017Policy INDP12 of the Ilkley Neighbourhood Development Plan 2020-2030Policy SC8 of the Core StrategyPolicy SC7 of the Core Strategy
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84eParagraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 58Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors (2017) EWHC 2743 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed22 October 20266013460Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
- Dismissed20 October 20266012872Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
- Dismissed15 September 20266008465Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
- Dismissed20 July 20266008285Ghyll Clough Farm, Slaymaker Lane, Oakworth, Bradford, BD22 7EH
- Dismissed11 June 20266004631Cuckoo Cottage, Moor Road, Ilkley, LS29 7BE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®