Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 October 20223302368

Lynn Street, Stranton, Hartlepool, TS24 7BY

Planning appeal 3302368 at Lynn Street, Stranton, Hartlepool, TS24 7BY (Hartlepool Borough Council *) was dismissed on 25 October 2022 by Inspector Megginson C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites.

a Proposed telecommunications installation: Proposed 15.0m Phase 9 super slimline Monopole and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Megginson C
Postcode
TS24 7BY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The height, positioning and visual prominence of the proposed monopole would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area that was not outweighed by the benefits of 5G coverage, combined with insufficient evidence that less harmful alternative sites had been properly explored.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy RC3Policy INF5Policy QP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 126Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

45 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hartlepool

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed17 September 20266008410
    14 Elm Grove, Hartlepool, TS26 8LZ
  2. Allowed28 August 20266011212
    58 Ryehill Gardens, Hartlepool, TS26 0JJ
  3. Dismissed21 April 20266003791
    43 Kildale Grove, Hartlepool, County Durham, TS25 2AG
  4. Dismissed30 March 20263356466
    Low Throston House, Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
  5. Notice varied and upheld30 March 20263344250
    Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.