Planning appeal decision
Plot 6, The Stables, Stanbridge Road, Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, LU7 9JH
Planning appeal 3302529 at Plot 6, The Stables, Stanbridge Road, Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, LU7 9JH (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 2 August 2024 by Inspector Taylor K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
change of use of land to use as residential caravan site for 2 gypsy families with a total of 5 caravans, including no more than 3 static caravans/mobile homes, together with the laying of hardstanding and erection of 2 ancillary amenity buildings
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Taylor K
- Postcode
- LU7 9JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Biodiversity, with particular reference to any direct effects on the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
- Whether the proposal would comply with local and national planning policy having regard to drainage, foul and surface water
- Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm from drainage/foul water issues, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced, so very special circumstances were not established.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with substantial harm from drainage/foul and surface water issues and moderate harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (unmet need, lack of alternative sites, personal circumstances of occupiers), so the appeals were dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy H7Policy HQ1Policy EE5Policy EE3Policy EE2Policy CC5Policy CC6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 180Paragraph 109
- Judgments
- Smith v SSLUHC & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026336326410 Knolls View, Totternhoe, Dunstable, LU6 2BT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®