Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld2 August 20243302529

Plot 6, The Stables, Stanbridge Road, Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, LU7 9JH

Planning appeal 3302529 at Plot 6, The Stables, Stanbridge Road, Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, LU7 9JH (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 2 August 2024 by Inspector Taylor K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

change of use of land to use as residential caravan site for 2 gypsy families with a total of 5 caravans, including no more than 3 static caravans/mobile homes, together with the laying of hardstanding and erection of 2 ancillary amenity buildings

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Taylor K
Postcode
LU7 9JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Biodiversity, with particular reference to any direct effects on the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
  • Whether the proposal would comply with local and national planning policy having regard to drainage, foul and surface water
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm from drainage/foul water issues, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced, so very special circumstances were not established.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with substantial harm from drainage/foul and surface water issues and moderate harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (unmet need, lack of alternative sites, personal circumstances of occupiers), so the appeals were dismissed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy H7Policy HQ1Policy EE5Policy EE3Policy EE2Policy CC5Policy CC6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 180Paragraph 109
Judgments
Smith v SSLUHC & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1391

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

39 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed15 October 20266009682
    Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
  2. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  3. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263363264
    10 Knolls View, Totternhoe, Dunstable, LU6 2BT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.