Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 December 20223302744

33 Kingsway, Dursley, Gloucestershire, GL11 4DJ

Planning appeal 3302744 at 33 Kingsway, Dursley, Gloucestershire, GL11 4DJ (Stroud District Council) was dismissed on 8 December 2022 by Inspector Davies H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.

Erection of 1no. dwelling with associated works

Authority
Stroud District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Davies H
Postcode
GL11 4DJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Severn Estuary Special Area of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, with regard to recreational pressure
  • The effect of the proposed access and layout arrangements on highway safety

What decided it

The proposed development would result in significant harm to the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area by introducing a second dwelling into a plot with proportions significantly out of keeping with the predominant layout and density of Kingsway.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HC1Policy CP8Policy CP14Policy H1Policy D1Policy ES6Policy CP13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 9

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

42 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stroud

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed13 October 20266009483
    Land Northwest of Stonehouse, Grid Ref Easting: 379777. Grid Ref Northing: 207047, Stonehouse, Gl10 3WP
  2. Dismissed5 May 20263376602
    Land Adjoining The Deyne, Littleworth, Amberley, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 5AL
  3. Allowed17 November 20253366140
    Land West of A4135 Draycott, Cam, GL11 5LN
  4. Dismissed7 November 20256000653
    Baytree Cottage, Arlingham, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL2 7JH
  5. Dismissed29 September 20253358535
    Car Park Land, North West of Box Road, Cam, GL11 5FB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.