®Planning appeal decision
62 Shay Lane, Heaton, Bradford, BD9 6SQ
Planning appeal 3303129 at 62 Shay Lane, Heaton, Bradford, BD9 6SQ (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 27 September 2022 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies.
first floor extension
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cullen F
- Postcode
- BD9 6SQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building known as Shay Farm Cottage, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing disproportionate additions to the original building, would harm the openness of the Green Belt, would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building, and the other considerations did not clearly outweigh these harms to establish very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SC7 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development Plan Document 2017Policy EN3 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development Plan Document 2017Bradford Council Householder Supplementary Planning Document 2012
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed22 October 20266013460Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
- Dismissed20 October 20266012872Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
- Dismissed15 September 20266008465Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
- Allowed10 August 20266002654Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
- Dismissed20 July 20266008285Ghyll Clough Farm, Slaymaker Lane, Oakworth, Bradford, BD22 7EH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.