Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 September 20223303247

85 Upper Village Road, ASCOT, SL5 7AJ

a part 2 storey part single storey side extension and rear extension and a new porch

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Greenwood L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the safety of public highway users in relation to parking provision at the site
  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area

What decided it

The proposal would not make adequate provision for on-plot parking and would prejudice the safety of public highway users by forcing parked vehicles to encroach onto the footway or remain unused, thereby conflicting with local plan and neighbourhood plan policies.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: BLP policy QP3, BLP policy IF2, NP policy T1, NP policy DG1, NP policy DG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.