Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted12 May 20233303610

32 Wells House Road, Park Royal, London, NW10 6EE

Planning appeal 3303610 at 32 Wells House Road, Park Royal, London, NW10 6EE (Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation) was allowed on 12 May 2023 by Inspector Merrett R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the original dwelling and the wider area.

Without planning permission, the construction of a part first floor extension (above existing single storey side extension) and part two storey side extension; rear roof extension (to main roof slope and over rear outrigger); and external alterations to the resultant building, including render painted yellow

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Merrett R
Postcode
NW10 6EE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the original dwelling and the wider area
  • The living conditions of nearby residents, having particular regard to outlook and visual amenity

What decided it

The developments, despite breaching planning control, do not result in harm to character and appearance or living conditions that would justify enforcement action, particularly given the fallback position of permitted roof extensions and the acceptable visual impact of the side extension from the public realm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D6London Plan 2021Policy SP2Policy SP9Policy D3Policy D5Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation Local Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

358 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20253354820
    Centre House St. Leonards Road, London, NW10 6ST
  2. Notice upheld17 January 20253328458
    860A Coronation Road, London, NW10 7PS
  3. Notice upheld14 November 20243326379
    245A Acton Lane, Park Royal, London, NW10 7NR
  4. Notice upheld7 November 20243324326
    6 Standard Road, Chase Estate, Acton, London, NW10 6EU
  5. Notice upheld23 July 20243333433
    34 Standard Road, London, NW10 6EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.