Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 February 20233303794

Land 403553 434450 Back Leeming, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9NL

Planning appeal 3303794 at Land 403553 434450 Back Leeming, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9NL (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 24 February 2023 by Inspector Szymanski D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue is the effect of the proposed development upon the character, appearance and significance of the Leeming Conservation Area (the LCA).

CONSTRUCTION OF ONE HOUSE WITH ACCESS AND LANDSCAPING

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
BD22 9NL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue is the effect of the proposed development upon the character, appearance and significance of the Leeming Conservation Area (the LCA).

What decided it

The proposal would prevent remediation of harm caused by unlawful tree felling and result in less than substantial harm to the Leeming Conservation Area which was not outweighed by the limited public benefits.

the limited public benefits (economic, housing land supply, highway betterment, living conditions, biodiversity net gain and removal of derelict buildings) did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the Leeming Conservation Area, to which great weight was given

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN3Policy EN5Policy GP7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 11
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] 2AC 304

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266010672
    25-27 Kensington Street, Bradford, BD8 9LZ
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266004749
    1 Corn Mill Fold, Bradford, BD6 2HQ
  3. Dismissed21 July 20266008478
    95 Lilycroft Road, Bradford, BD9 5AH
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266002874
    1, Chapel Street, Bradford, BD5 0LF
  5. Dismissed7 April 20266004938
    96 Avondale Road, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD18 4QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.