Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 February 20233303963

Fireaway Pizza, 75 High Street, Whitton, Twickenham, TW2 7LD

Planning appeal 3303963 at Fireaway Pizza, 75 High Street, Whitton, Twickenham, TW2 7LD (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 27 February 2023 by Inspector Clowes M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the development, having regard to the vitality and viability of the Whitton key shopping frontage.

the change of use of retail (E use class) into restaurant (E use class) including installation of extraction flue system to rear, without complying with a condition attached to planning permission 22/1008/FUL dated 27 May 2022

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Clowes M
Postcode
TW2 7LD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the development, having regard to the vitality and viability of the Whitton key shopping frontage
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of existing occupiers, with particular regard to noise
  • Highway safety with particular regard to adequacy of car parking

What decided it

The ancillary and subservient nature of the proposed take-away service to the primary restaurant use, combined with the Council's prior acceptance of the loss of retail space and the absence of objective evidence of unacceptable noise or highway impacts, justified removal of the restrictive condition.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP26Policy LP8Policy LP10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 86Paragraph 110Paragraph 111

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

466 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266011219
    10 Water Lane, Richmond, TW9 1TJ
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  4. Dismissed28 July 20266006160
    Tearfund, 100, Church Road, Teddington, TW11 8QE, 100, Church Road, Teddington,, TW11 8QE
  5. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.