Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 July 20233303989

159 Maylands Drive, Sidcup, DA14 4RN

Planning appeal 3303989 at 159 Maylands Drive, Sidcup, DA14 4RN (London Borough of Bexley) was dismissed on 3 July 2023 by Inspector Hunter A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the higher parapet walls upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining property, No. 157 Maylands Drive, with particular regard to outlook.

Variation of condition 2 to increase the height of rear parapet walls from 3.1 metres to 3.35 metres on an approved single storey side and rear extension with new front canopy and alterations to front driveway

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hunter A
Postcode
DA14 4RN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the higher parapet walls upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining property, No. 157 Maylands Drive, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The additional 0.25 metres in parapet wall height, combined with the extension's proximity to the adjoining property's glazed openings and its projection beyond the existing rear elevation, would harmfully affect the outlook and living conditions of the occupiers of No. 157 Maylands Drive in conflict with Policy DP11 of the Bexley Local Plan and paragraph 130 of the NPPF.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP11 of the Bexley Local Planparagraph 2.3.2 (1) of the Council of the London Borough of Bexley's Design and Development Control Guidelines 2 - Extensions to Houses
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

157 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bexley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266013098
    Rear Of 110-112 Belvedere Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4PF
  2. Allowed19 October 20266010781
    126 Crayford Road, Crayford, Dartford, DA1 4ES
  3. Allowed12 October 20266004983
    Land to the Rear of No. 48 Sidcup High Street, Bexley, DA14 6EH
  4. Allowed2 October 20266012368
    35 Cumberland Drive, Bexleyheath, DA7 5LA
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012819
    17 Percy Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4DZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.