Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 May 20233304163

Valentine Cottage, Ethelbert Road, ROCHFORD, Essex, SS4 3JS

Proposed new dwelling and associated development

Authority
Rochford District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on openness and the purpose of the Green Belt
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by any other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt because it does not fall within any of the exceptions in paragraph 149 of the Framework, and the harm to openness and the purposes of the Green Belt is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the neutral factors (character, living conditions, highway safety) and the benefit of contributing to housing supply.

Framework references: 137, 138, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: CS Policy GB1

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.