®Planning appeal decision
Land Adj. Lynns Park, Stonehill Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0EW
Planning appeal 3304173 at Land Adj. Lynns Park, Stonehill Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0EW (Runnymede Borough Council) was allowed on 19 December 2022 by Inspector Price J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the proposal's effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
change of use to residential, comprising the siting of one mobile home and the formation of a new access
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Price J
- Postcode
- KT16 0EW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the proposal's effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- its effect on the character and appearance of the area, particularly in respect of tree cover
- whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The significant unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller sites in Runnymede combined with the best interests of the appellant's children clearly outweighed the identified Green Belt and other harm, amounting to very special circumstances.
The substantial Green Belt harm (inappropriateness plus moderate loss of openness) and limited harm to character and appearance were clearly outweighed by the significant unmet need for Traveller sites and the appellant's personal circumstances, including the best interests of his children, amounting to very special circumstances justifying the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EE19Policy EE11Policy SL22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 148Paragraph 56Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- People Over Wind, Peter Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta C-323/17; Smith v SSLUHC & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1391; Wychavon District Council v SSCLG [2008] EWCA Civ 692; Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed29 October 20266006748St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
- Dismissed17 August 20266008286203 Almners Road, Lyne, KT16 0BL
- Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
- Dismissed5 May 20263376337Webbs The Green, Englefield Green, Egham, TW20 0YX
- Dismissed3 March 202660024817 Ottershaw Park, Ottershaw, KT16 0QG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.