Planning appeal decision
Bamford House, 14 Silver Street, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8DH
Permission in principle for the erection of 1 dwelling
- Authority
- Cotswold District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the site would be an appropriate location for housing with particular regard to local and national policy
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to the site's location within the Conservation Area
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the Council's strategic spatial housing policies by locating housing outside the development boundary where it is not permitted, and causes harm to the Conservation Area that is not outweighed by public benefits.
The significant weight given to maintaining the plan-led system and the great weight given to conservation of the heritage asset were not outweighed by the moderate weight given to housing supply, limited weight to working from home opportunities and low-carbon design, and modest economic and social benefits from a single dwelling.
Framework references: 11, 80, 199, 202
Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DS4, Policy H3(2), Policy H1, Policy EN11, Policy EN5, Policy S9
Judgments cited: Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council [2017] UKSC 37
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®