Planning appeal decision
Bamford House, 14 Silver Street, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8DH
Planning appeal 3304455 at Bamford House, 14 Silver Street, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8DH (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 27 February 2023 by Inspector Stephens K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the site would be an appropriate location for housing with particular regard to local and national policy.
Permission in principle for the erection of 1 dwelling
- Authority
- Cotswold District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
- Postcode
- GL8 8DH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the site would be an appropriate location for housing with particular regard to local and national policy
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to the site's location within the Conservation Area
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the Council's strategic spatial housing policies by locating housing outside the development boundary where it is not permitted, and causes harm to the Conservation Area that is not outweighed by public benefits.
The significant weight given to maintaining the plan-led system and the great weight given to conservation of the heritage asset were not outweighed by the moderate weight given to housing supply, limited weight to working from home opportunities and low-carbon design, and modest economic and social benefits from a single dwelling.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS1Policy DS4Policy H3(2)Policy H1Policy EN11Policy EN5Policy S9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council [2017] UKSC 37
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cotswold
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266010613Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
- Dismissed19 August 20266007188Brook Close, Rodmarton, Cirencester, GL7 6PE
- Allowed5 August 20266006284Land Parcel North Of Olimpick Drive, Chipping Campden, GL55 6BL
- Dismissed26 June 20266003681Land off May Lane, Ebrington, GL55 6NJ
- Allowed15 June 20266002824Land North of The Wern, Lechlade, GL7 3DN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®